Last modified: 1997-10-27 by vincent morley
Keywords: bulgaria | balkans | europe | lion |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
See also:
One of these days the Bulgarian parliament will adopt new coat of arms.
Bulgaria is since 1990 without coat of arms, when the communist design - which
featured in the flag - was abolished. Since then there has been a long battle for a
new national coat of arms. In the last five years there were already two attempts
to create a new coat of arms, but both proposals didn't get the majority in the
parliament. Last February prime minister Zjan Videnov (socialist -
ex-communist) chose a design out of five proposals. This shows only a 'naked'
lion. The opposition party SDS however wants this lion crowned. Even the
Bulgarian Constitutional Court was asked if the lion should have a crown or
not. This Court recently said that a crown can be part of the national coat of
arms. But the ruling socialists (ex-communists) have now a majority in the
Bulgarian parliament and will soon agree with Videnov's proposal.
Source: NRC Handelsblad (Rotterdam), 28 July 1995, citing the (Bulgarian?)
magazine 'Transition', that "this week wrote about the question on the coat of
arms".
Jos Poels 30-JUL-95
'Transition' is the title of a journal published by the Open Media
Research Institute (OMRI) based in Prague (formerly the Research
Institute of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty).
I checked the OMRI WWW site and found a table of contents for
their 'Transition' journal. The article Jos mentioned is probably:
There have been some developments concerning the coat of arms of Bulgaria,
as reported by the OMRI in an 'Analytical Brief' dated 7 August 1996 and
available at URL http://www.omri.cz/Publications/Analytical/AB.960807-258.
The latest development is that the parliament of Bulgaria adopted a new coat of
arms 25 July 1996, only to find that the president vetoed it (6 August 1996). The
Bulgarian constitution states that the coat of arms must be a golden lion on
a dark red field. Bulgaria's parliament is dominated by Socialists who
prefer the lion to be uncrowned, because they see the crown as a symbol of
monarchy. The opposition on the other hand, see the crown as a symbol of
sovereignty. They want a crowned lion or a crowned shield (or they want the
arms from the time of the monarchy reinstated). The coat of arms adopted by
parliament (110 of the 240 MPs walked out before the vote) is a golden
uncrowned rampant lion on a dark red field. President Zhelyu Zhelev objected
to the new emblem because he is afraid it will become a party badge of the
Socialists, rather than a uniting national symbol. Parliament may still
overturn the President's veto.
Jan Oskar Engene 29-AUG-1996
In response to the question on that means the presence of a flag
green over red in the coat of arms of the Kingdom of Bulgaria, my
first supposition were that were tried to the land flag of the Ottoman
Empire, but as will be able be proven this is red on
green. For so much presumably it would be tried to the flag n of the
autonomous territory to Eastern Rumelia, embryo to Bulgaria, and that
yet would be maintained in the shield. Probably the first Bulgarian
flag was green on red, since the text of the book, upon describing the
shield, indicates that the lions support "the flag of Bulgaria"; when
afterwards it describes the flag already indicates the existence of a
white band superior (that is to say three bands as the current). The
flag with red table in the angle containing the crowned lion, it is
described as war flag. The tape in the lower part is white, green
and red in horizontal striping and carries the following registration
(but in Cyrillic characters): 'Saedinenieto pravi silata'
The tongue of the lion in the shield, is indicated as green.
Jaume Ollé 18-JUN-1996